Strategic Implementation

ACT Prep: In-Depth Steps

A comprehensive roadmap to building an exceptional, institution-defining ACT program

ACT Prep as a Strategic Imperative

This strategic vision depends on building not just a successful ACT Prep program, but an exceptional, institution-defining one. What we are proposing is ambitious, difficult, and necessary if Comp Sci High is serious about expanding access to the most selective colleges in the country.

"We have trouble right here in River City." — Professor Hill

01

Understanding the Challenge

What we are actually asking students to do

Target ACT Benchmarks
32+
3-4 students per cohort

Harvard, Yale, Princeton, MIT, Stanford, Caltech

30+
3-4 students per cohort

Brown, Columbia, UPenn, Dartmouth

28+
3-5 students per cohort

Cornell

These scores are table-stakes requirements to even be considered — not guarantees of admission.

Long-Term Aspirational Outcomes
10

Students per grade with qualifying ACT scores

Meaningfully competitive for the most selective colleges

32+ (HYPSM-competitive)
3-4 students
30+ (Ivy-competitive)
3-4 students
28+ (Cornell-competitive)
3-5 students
Where We Are Now: A Hard Reality Check
Current Student ACT Composite Scores

Current Top 10th & 11th Grade ACT Results — Highest composite score: 27

Current Top 10th & 11th Grade Testers:

  • Not a single student scored at a level that would qualify them for Ivy-level consideration
  • After the top three scores, performance drops sharply
  • By the 5th student, results are already far from required benchmarks
  • These are the highest-testing students in the school, not the average

Historical Context

These results are consistent with Comp Sci High's standardized testing history.

Achieving a 30+ or 32+ ACT score is academically comparable to earning multiple 5s on AP exams across subjects — something that has never happened in CSH history.

Yet our goal is not to do this once. Our goal is to do this for 10 students per grade, every year.

The Task with some Context

AP Exam 5 Rates — National vs CSHAP Exam 5 Rates vs ACT Top Score Rates (National Data)
Why Traditional ACT Prep Models Will Not Work

Programs like Bespoke — which were unable to generate meaningful results with our students — fail for two fundamental reasons:

1. Misunderstanding Academic Gaps

They do not understand the depth and variability of our students' academic gaps. Our students often have layered gaps in reading, writing, grammar, quantitative reasoning, and test fluency.

2. Underestimating Time Requirements

They underestimate the amount of time and repetition our students need. ACT success requires sustained, intensive instruction, not short-term exposure.

To Contextualize:

  • An AP teacher typically provides 100–150 hours of instruction for a single subject exam
  • The ACT tests four subjects
  • Many assume a 30–40 hour prep course is sufficient. That assumption is false for our student population.
02

The Solution: Program Design

Expertise + Time + Targeted Instruction

The Core Solution

A Dedicated ACT Expert Who:

  • Knows the exam inside and out
  • Understands how to level-set expectations with students
  • Commits significant, sustained time to our program

Comprehensive Academic Skill-Building Including:

English language norms
Reading comprehension
Writing and research
Quantitative reasoning
Study skills and organization

Critical Understanding:

This cannot be a bolt-on program. It must be structural, intensive, and respected.

Program Design Principles

This is NOT an "ACT-for-all" model

Participation must be targeted and aligned with students' postsecondary goals

Students will be:

  • Coached on ACT content
  • Simultaneously monitored and supported in their school-based academic performance
  • Explicitly taught academic skills they are not receiving in class but will be expected to have in selective college environments
Proposed Weekly Schedule

8:00–9:30 AM — In-person ACT & Academic Skills class

Monday & Wednesday

Class during reading block

Monday & Wednesday

Small-group pull-outs (45 minutes)

Alternative: once-monthly 3-hour Saturday ACT session

Wednesday

Virtual Office Hours

Monday & Wednesday — 2 hours per day

Mix of required check-ins and open support

Instructional Focus

ACT-specific skills integrated with:

Reading Full Texts

Comprehensive reading comprehension development

Analytical Writing

Writing analytical and research papers

Grammar & Language

Grammar and language conventions mastery

Study Systems

For both school and standardized tests

03

Implementation & Accountability

Structure, oversight, and student selection

Academic Oversight & Accountability

Bi-weekly meetings with the Director of Academic Programming to:

Review grades
Track skill growth
Identify academic risks early
Adjust instructional plans
Summer Programming

Four-Week Intensive ACT Bootcamp

Structured as two 2-week sessions

Focused on acceleration
Intensive repetition
Score jumps and breakthroughs
Student Selection & Accountability

Participants Drawn From:

Top testers in 10th and 11th grade

Top academic performers

Approximately 15 students per grade

Key Policies:

Once a student earns a qualifying ACT score:

  • They exit ACT test prep
  • Remain in academic skill-building supports
  • Their seat opens for a student from the waitlist

Students earn course credit

The Clear Outcome

Students who complete this pipeline should be legitimately competitive for Ivy League institutions and top ten colleges and universities.

This is not branding.

This is intentional, data-driven access building, and it requires us to build something far stronger than what has existed before.